Forest Structure and Potential of Carbon Storage at Khao Nam Sab, Kasetsart University, Sri Racha Campus, Chonburi Province

Authors

  • Sathid Thinkampheang Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand / Cooperation Centre of Thai Forest Ecological Research Network, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Napongson Punthunan Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand / Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Thaworn Korkerd Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Ritthikai Saikhammoon Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Chatpimuk Yatar Royal Forest Department, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Chatchai Sawasmongkol Royal Forest Department, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
  • Wongsatorn Phumphuang Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand / Cooperation Centre of Thai Forest Ecological Research Network, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34044/tferj.2025.9.1.6291

Keywords:

Biodiversity, aboveground biomass, carbon sequestration, plant succession

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Tropical Forest ecosystems are globally significant for their roles in biodiversity conservation, climate regulation, and carbon sequestration. In Thailand, two predominant forest types, Dry evergreen forest (DEF) and mixed deciduous forest (MDF), are of high ecological value but differ in species composition, canopy structure, and successional status. DEF is characterized by multi-layered canopies and high species richness, while MDF often supports fast-growing, early-successional species and exhibits more open canopy structures. Khao Nam Sap Forest, located within the Kasetsart University Sriracha Campus in Chonburi Province, is a secondary forest landscape that has undergone natural regeneration following historical logging and land conversion. This study aimed to assess forest structure, species diversity, aboveground biomass, and carbon sequestration potential in both DEF and MDF areas. In addition, the study investigates how environmental variables such as elevation, soil pH, and organic matter influence tree community distribution. These findings contribute to understanding forest dynamics in secondary tropical forests and support Thailand’s national carbon neutrality policies.

Methodology: The study was conducted using a systematic line plot survey across Khao Nam Sap Forest, which spans approximately 54.4 hectares. A total of 51 vegetation plots, each measuring 30 × 30 meters, were established along transects distributed throughout the DEF and MDF zones. In each plot, all trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 4.5 cm were identified, measured, and geo-referenced. Soil samples were collected at 0–15 cm depth at five points per plot and analyzed for pH, texture, and organic matter. Biomass was estimated using species-specific allometric equations, and carbon stocks were calculated by applying a standard conversion factor (47% of biomass). Carbon dioxide sequestration was estimated based on the carbon content multiplied by the CO2 conversion ratio (44/12). Cluster analysis and Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) were used to classify vegetation communities and examine the influence of environmental gradients on species distribution.

Main Results: A total of 120 species belonging to 90 genera, 39 families were identified across the study area. The overall tree density was 1,264.49 individuals ha-1, with a mean basal area of 14.64 m2·ha-1. The Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index was calculated at 3.69, reflecting high species diversity. Dominant species identified based on the Importance Value Index (IVI) included: Terminalia nigrovenulosa (Combretaceae): a late-successional species dominating DEF with tall straight trunks and strong wood. Dialium cochinchinense (Fabaceae): a canopy species contributing significantly to biomass in both forest types. Diospyros coaetanea (Ebenaceae): a shade-tolerant species common in DEF, known for its dense wood. Vitex limonifolia (Lamiaceae), Atalantia monophylla (Rutaceae), and Hydnocarpus ilicifolia (Achariaceae): each with distinct ecological niches in both DEF and MDF zones. Cluster analysis based on species composition and forest structure separated the vegetation into 8 distinct forest communities at approximately 50% similarity. These were classified as: (1) Leucaena leucocephalaAtalantia monophylla community, (2) Diospyros castaneaLeucaena leucocephala community, (3) Vitex limonifoliaLeucaena leucocephala community, (4) Cratoxylum formosumVitex limonifolia community, (5) Lannea coromandelicaVitex limonifolia community, (6) Walsura trichostemonBriedelia ovata community, (7) Walsura trichostemonBixa orellana community, and (8) Hydnocarpus ilicifoliaWalsura trichostemon community respectively. These forest communities varied along gradients of elevation, canopy closure, and soil conditions. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) identified soil pH, elevation, and organic matter as the most significant environmental factors influencing species distribution. DEF communities were associated with moderately acidic soils (pH 5.7–7.2), height above mean sea level (above 150 m a.s.l.), and finer-textured soils. In contrast, MDF communities were linked to more alkaline, sandy soils with higher organic content, found in foothill areas and valleys. These findings support the hypothesis that species composition and forest structural attributes are strongly shaped by edaphic and topographic variability. The average total aboveground biomass was 612.70 t· ha-1, comprising stem biomass (477.94 t·ha-1), branch biomass (122.04 t·ha-1), and leaf biomass (12.72 t·ha-1). This corresponds to an average carbon stock of 287.97 tC ha-1 and an estimated tCO2-equivalent sequestration of 1,055.88 tCO2·ha-1. When analyzed by forest type, Dry Evergreen Forests exhibited significantly higher carbon storage and biomass than Mixed Deciduous Forests. Specifically: DEF plots had an average biomass of 445.06 t ha-1 and stored 209.18 tC ha-1 of carbon. MDF plots had significantly lower values, with 167.63 t ha-1 of biomass and 78.79 tC ha-1of carbon. A notable ecological concern is the widespread presence of Leucaena leucocephala, an invasive alien species dominating the forest edge, particularly in MDF zones. This fast-growing legume forms dense thickets that suppress native regeneration and may alter successional dynamics, reduce biodiversity, and diminish long-term carbon sequestration potential.

Conclusion: Khao Nam Sap Forest demonstrates considerable ecological potential, particularly within Dry Evergreen Forest areas, where structurally complex tree communities, high diversity, and substantial biomass contribute to robust carbon storage. The data highlight the crucial role of late-successional forests in maintaining ecosystem stability and resilience. Mixed Deciduous Forest areas, while less carbon-dense, offer diverse species assemblages and are valuable for understanding regeneration pathways in disturbed tropical landscapes. Integrating species data, biomass estimates, and environmental factors provides a comprehensive framework for forest restoration planning and management. These insights are vital for Thailand’s strategy toward achieving carbon neutrality, promoting forest-based climate solutions, and conserving native biodiversity under changing environmental conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashton, P. S. & H. Zhu. 2020. Tropical montane forests: Their structure, diversity, and conservation. Journal of Tropical Ecology 36(4): 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467420000203

Barton, K. E., C. E. Gorman & G. M. Wardle. 2013. Functional traits in ecological restoration: A review and case study in montane forests. Biological Conservation 167: 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.028

Cadotte, M. W., K. Carscadden & N. Mirotchnick. 2011. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology 48(5): 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x

Cardinale, B. J., J. E. Duffy & A. Gonzalez. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486(7401): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148

Chave, J., M. Réjou‐Méchain, A. Búrquez, E. Chidumayo, M. S. Colgan, W. B. C. Delitti, ... & G. Vieilledent. 2014. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Global Change Biology 20(10): 3177–3190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629

Connell, J. H. & R. O. Slatyer. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. The American Naturalist 111(982): 1119–1144. https://doi.org/10.1086/283241

IPCC. 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan.

IPCC. 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896

Kent, M. 2011. Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Lewis, S. L., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Sonké, B., Affum-Baffoe, K., Baker, T. R., Ojo, L. O. & H. Wöll. (2009). Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical forests. Nature 457(7232): 1003–1006. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07771

Loreau, M. & A. Hector. 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412(6842): 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/35083573

Malhi, Y., D. Wood, T. R. Baker, J. Wright, O. L. Phillips, T. Cochrane & B. Vinceti. 2006. The regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old‐growth Amazonian forests. Global Change Biology 12(7), 1107-1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01120.x

Marod, D. & U. Kutintara. 2009. Forest Ecology. Department of Forest Biology. Faculty of Forestry. Kasetsart University, Bangkok. (in Thai).

Marod, D., P. Duangkae, J. Thongsawi, W. Phumphuang, S. Thinkamphaeng, A. Kulwong & S. Hermhuk. 2017. Tree community classification and carbon sequestration assessment of dry dipterocarp forests, Kasetsart University, Sakon Nakhon Campus. Thai Forest Ecological Research Journal 1(1): 1–9.

Marod, D., P. Duengkae, U. Kutintara, S. Sungkaew, C. Wachrinrat, L. Asanok & N. Klomwattanakul. 2012. The Influences of an invasive plant species (Leucaena leucocephala) on tree regeneration in Khao Phuluang Forest, Northeastern Thailand. Kasetsart Journal (Natural Science) 46: 39–50.

Marod, D., S. Sungkaew, H. Mizunaga, S. Thinkampheang & J. Thonsawi. 2020. Woody plant community and distribution in a tropical coastal sand dune in southern Thailand. Journal of Coastal Conservation 24: 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-020-00761-9

Marod, D., U. Kutintara, H. Tanaka & T. Nakashizuka. 1999. Structural dynamics of a natural mixed deciduous forest in western Thailand. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 777–786. https://doi.org/10.2307/3237302

Marod. D., S. Sangkaew & W. Niemrat. 2003. Encroachment of native species into forest plantations. Thai Journal of Forestry 22: 1–15.

McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford. 2011. PC-ORD: Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 6.0 for Windows. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.

Ogawa, H. K., K. Yoda, K. Ogino, T.Shidei, D. Ratanawongse & C. Apasutaya. 1965. Comparative ecology study on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. I. structure and floristic composition. Nature and Life in Southeast Asia 4: 13–48.

ONEP. 2021. Thailand's Long-term Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Development Strategy (LT-LEDS). Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning.

Pan, Y., R. A. Birdsey, J. Fang, R. Houghton, P. E. Kauppi, W. A. Kurz. & D. Hayes. 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333(6045): 988–993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609

Phumphuang, W., D. Marod, S. Sungkaew & S. Thinkampaeng. 2018. Forest dynamics and tree distribution Patterns in dry evergreen forest, Northeastern, Thailand. Environmental and Natural Resources Journal 16(2): 58–67. 10.14456/ennrj.2018.15

Smitinand, T. 2014. Thai plant names (Revised edition 2014). Office of The Forest Herbarium, Forest and Plant Conservation Research Office, Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation. (in Thai).

Sodhi, N. S., B. W. Brook & C. J. A. Bradshaw. 2010. Conserving Southeast Asian Forest Biodiversity in Human-Modified Landscapes. Cambridge University Press.

Thai Meteorological Department. (2020). Thailand Climate Data 2020. Thai Meteorological Department, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)

Tsutsumi, M. 1983. Comparative toxicity of arsenite and arsenate to rice seedling under various levels of phosphate supply. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 29(1): 63–69.

Ordination of tree communities based on environmental variables in Khao Nam Sap Forest. The symbols of indicated sample plots, while and abbreviation represented plant species.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-28

Issue

Section

Original Article