Relationship between Fruiting Phenology and Climatic Factors in Lower Montane Forest at Doi Suthep – Pui National Park, Chiang Mai Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34044/tferj.2025.9.2.6304Keywords:
Fruit phenology, fruit trees, climatic factors, montane forestAbstract
Background and Objectives: The fruiting phenology of tree species is closely linked to seasonal patterns and climatic factors, both of which play a crucial role in determining the availability of food resources for a wide range of frugivores. These plant-animal interactions are fundamental to maintaining the stability of ecosystem and biodiversity. Amidst on going global climate change, understanding the mechanisms determining fruiting phenology is essential for predicting ecological dynamics and informing effective conservation planning. This is particularly crucial in the lower montane forest, which exhibits unique environmental conditions and is sensitive to climate change impacts, including rising temperatures and erratic rainfall. Nevertheless, understanding of climate change effects on fruiting phenology in Thailand’s montane forests remains insufficient. This research aimed to investigate the timing and magnitude of fruit production in tree species within a permanent lower montane forest plot at Huai Kog Ma, Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Chiang Mai Province. It also examines the relationship between fruiting phenology and climatic factors, aiming to establish a comprehensive understanding of the environmental drivers shaping fruiting phenology in this lower montane forest ecosystem.
Methodology: A comprehensive review of tree species in the lower montane forest permanent plot was conducted, drawing from databases and literature sources such as the Concise Encyclopedia of Plants in Thailand, the BGO Plant Database, the Useful Tropical Plants Database, and A Field Guide to Forest Trees of Northern Thailand, including a preliminary permanent plot survey to identify species bearing fleshy fruits consumed by wildlife. A diverse set of 32 species from 21 families was selected to ensure broad taxonomic representation. Fruiting phenology was monitored for at least five mature individuals per species using binoculars from October 2016 to December 2018. The average monthly fruiting percentage for each species was then calculated. The relationships between fruiting phenology and climatic factors were analyzed using multiple linear regression in R software.
Main Results: Based on 32 tree species for fruit production monitoring, 18 species were found to bear fruits during the observation period. These species were categorized into three phenological groups. Group 1 comprised species fruiting in the dry season (November–April), including Eurya acuminata, Litsea cambodiana, and Prunus arborea. Group 2 consisted of species fruiting in the rainy season (May–October), including Baccaurea ramiflora, Protium serratum, Saurauia roxburghii, and Syzygium tetragonum. Group 3 comprised species that fruited continuously throughout the year without a specific season, including Acronychia pedunculata, Apodytes dimidiata, Canthiumera glabra, Choerospondias axillaris, Ficus curtipes, Ficus simplicissima, Ficus elmeri, Garcinia celebica, Madhuca floribunda, Melia azedarach, and Heptapleurum heptaphyllum. The timing and quantity of fruit production for each species were influenced by various factors, including tree size, soil nutrient availability, tree density in the area, and climatic conditions. Upon analyzing the relationship between fruiting phenology and climatic factors, it was observed that 8 out of 18 species exhibited a significant correlation with rainfall and temperature. These species can be classified into two distinct groups. The first group comprises four species whose fruiting patterns were significantly correlated with rainfall. Among these, two species—P. serratum and A. dimidiata—demonstrated a positive correlation with rainfall, while two species—F. simplicissima and M. floribunda—exhibited a negative correlation. The second group includes four species whose fruiting was significantly correlated with temperature. Among these, two species—B. ramiflora and F. curtipes—displayed a positive correlation with temperature, while the other two—A. pedunculata and E. acuminata— exhibited a negative correlation. In analyzing the study results in conjunction with climatic data spanning from 2019 to 2022, it was observed that monthly rainfall exhibited significant variability, particularly in the year 2022, during which precipitation experienced a notable increase during the rainy season. Conversely, temperature fluctuations were relatively minor. This observation suggests that the fruiting phenology of species associated with rainfall may also exhibit substantial variability. These findings suggest that species whose fruiting is sensitive to rainfall, particularly F. simplicissima and M. floribunda, may exhibit reduced fruit production under increased precipitation. As both are key food sources for various frugivores, alterations in their fruiting patterns could result in food scarcity, triggering intensified interspecific competition or dietary shifts among wildlife. Such behavioral changes may reduce seed dispersal opportunities for these species, potentially limiting their reproductive success and risking local extinction. If similar effects are experienced by other species. resulting disruption could compromise forest regeneration processes and destabilize the ecological balance of the lower montane forest system.
Conclusion: On going climate change undeniably influences the alterations in the fruiting phenology of those species closely associated with climatic factors. Consequently, it affects frugivores that function as key seed dispersers and disrupts natural ecosystem regeneration processes. The study offers valuable insights into tree species, highly vulnerable to climate change, highlighting the urgent need for conservation strategies aimed at mitigating extinction risks. Such efforts are essential for sustaining ecological balance and promoting the long-term resilience of forest ecosystems under changing environmental conditions.
Downloads
References
Awasthi, B., J. Chen & K. R. McConkey. 2024. Fruiting trees provide fruit and insect resources for four tropical deer species. Ecosphere 15(7): e4889. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4889
Bendix, J., J. Homeier, E. O. Cueva, P. Emck, S. W. Breckle, M. Richter & E. Beck. 2006. Seasonality of weather and tree phenology in a tropical evergreen mountain rain forest. International Journal of Biometeorology 50(6): 370–384. DOI:10.1007/s00484-006-0029-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-006-0029-8
Chowdhury, M. A. I., M. N. Islam & A. H. M. Nury. 2019. Study of rainfall variabilities in Southeast Asia using long-term data. Journal of Hydrology 578: 124002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124002
Department of Environmental Quality Promotion. 2002. Environment Encyclopedia 1st Thai Forest. Planning and technical division, Department of Environmental Quality Promotion, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Dunham, A. E., O. H. Razafindratsima, P. Rakotnirina & P. C. Wright. 2018. Fruiting phenology is linked to rainfall variability in a tropical rain forest. Biotropica 50(3): 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12564
Fern, K. 2014. Useful tropical plants database. Available Source: http://tropical.theferns.info/ (Accessed: July 1, 2019)
Ferraz, R. A., S. Leone, J. M. A. Souza. R. B. Ferreira, J. H. Modesto & L. L. Arruda. 2020. Phenology, vegetative growth, and yield performance of fig in Southeastern Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. v.55, e01192, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/ S1678-3921.pab2020.v55.01192
Forest Botany Division. 2016. Concise encyclopedia of plants in Thailand. Forest Botany Division, Forest and Plant Conservation Research Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. Bangkok, Thailand. Available source: http://www.dnp.go.th/botany/detail_wordsci.aspx. (Accessed: July 1, 2019). (in Thai)
Gardner, S., P. Sidisunthorn & V. Anusarnsunthorn. 2007. A field guide to forest trees of northern Thailand. Kobfai Publishing Project, Bangkok.
Gautier-Hion, A., J. M. Duplantier, R. Quris, F. Feer, C. Sourd, J. P. Decoux, G. Dubost, L. Emmons, C. Erard, P. Hecketsweiler, A. Moungazi, C. Roussilhon & J. M. Thiollay. 1985. Fruit characters as a basis of fruit choice and seed dispersal in a tropical forest vertebrate community. Oecologia 65: 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378906
Gazagne, E., J. L. Pitance, T. Savini, M. C. Huynen, P. Poncin, F. Brotcorne & A. Hambuckers. 2020. Seed Shadows of Northern Pigtailed Macaques within a degraded Forest Fragment, Thailand. Forests 2020 (11): 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111184
Glomvinya, S., C. Tantasirin, P. Tongdeenok & N. Tanaka. 2016. Changes in rainfall characteristics at Huai Kog-ma Watershed, Chiang Mai province. Thai Journal of Forestry 35: 66–77.
Herrera, C. M. 2002. Seed dispersal by vertebrates. pp.185–208. In: Herrera, C. M. & O. Pellmyr (eds.). Plant–Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Publishing.
Heydel, F. & O. Tackenberg. 2017. How are the phenologies of ripening and seed release affected by species’ ecology and evolution? Oikos 126: 738–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03442
Howe, H. F. 1977. Bird Activity and Seed Dispersal of a Tropical Wet Forest Tree. Ecology 58(3): 539–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1939003
Hydro Informatics Institute. 2023. 2023 Thailand Water Situation. Hydro Informatics Institute. Available source: https://www.thaiwater.net/uploads/contents/current/YearlyReport2023/rain2.html (Accessed: April 29, 2025). (in Thai)
Kitamura, S., T. Yumoto, P. Poonswad, P. Chuailua, K. Plongmai, T. Maruhashi & N. Noma. 2002. Interactions between Fleshy Fruits and Frugivores in a Tropical Seasonal Forest in Thailand Oecologia 133(4): 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1073-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1073-7
Kitamura, S., T. Yumoto, P. Poonswad, P. Chuailua, K. Plongmai, N. Noma, T. Maruhashi & P. Wohandee. 2005. Fruit-frugivore interactions in a moist evergreen forest of Khao Yai National Park in Thailand. Tropics 14(4): 345–355. https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.14.345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.14.345
Marod, D., S. Sungkeaw, P. Duengkae, L. Asanok, T. Kamyo, S. Hermhuk, A. Panmongkol & S. Thinkampheang. 2015. Plant diversity of lower montane evergreen forest at Huai Kogma Watershed Area, Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Chiang Mai Province. pp. 51–60. In: Proceedings of Thai Forest Ecological Research Network Conference, T-FERN 4, January 22–23, 2015, Faculty of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand. (in Thai)
Marod. D. S. Thinkampheang, W. Phumphuang, A. Yarnvudhi, J. Thongsawi, P. Kachina, T. Nakashizuka, H. Kurokawa & S. Hermhuk. 2025. Relationship Between Climate Changes and Forest Dynamics Along Altitudinal Gradients at Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Northern Thailand. Forests 16: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ f16010114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f16010114
Minor, D. M. & R. K. Kobe. 2019. Fruit production is influence by tree size and size-asymmetric crowding in a wet tropical forest. Ecology and Evolution 2019(9): 1058–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4867
Moles, A. T., D. D. Ackerly, C. O. Webb, J. C. Tweddle, J. B. Dickie & M. Westoby. 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science 307(5709): 576–580. DOI: 10.1126/science.1104863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104863
Morellato, L. P. C., D. C. Talora, A. Takahasi, C. C. Bencke, E. C. Romera & V. B. Zipparro. 2000. Phenology of Atlantic Rain Forest Trees: A Comparative Study. Biotropica 32(4b): 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00620.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00620.x
Namuta, S., K. Yamaguchi, M. Shimizu, G. Sakurai, A. Morimoto, N. Alias, N. Z. N. Azman, T. Hosaka & A. Satake. 2022. Impacts of climate change on reproductive phenology in tropical rainforests of Southeast Asia. Communications Biology 5: 311. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03245-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03245-8
Parrado-Rosselli, A., J. Cavelier & A. van Dulmen. 2002. Effect of Fruit Size on Primary Seed Dispersal of Five Canopy Tree Species of the Colombian Amazon. Selbyana 23(2): 245–257
Panda, S., D.R. Bhardwaj, P. Sharma, A.K. Handa & D. Kumar. 2021. Impact of climatic patterns on phenophase and growth of multi-purpose trees of north-western mid-Himalayan ecosystem. Trees, Forests and People 6: 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100143
Pimrat, M. 2016. Dynamics of tree seedlings under gap and crown canopy in lower montane evergreen forest at Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Chiang Mai Province. M.S. Thesis, Kasetsart University. Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)
POWO. 2025. Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available source: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (Accessed: June 5, 2025)
R Core Team. 2025. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available source: http://www.R-project.org. (Accessed: April 10, 2025)
Rueangket, A., P. Duengkae, S. Thinkampheang & D. Marod. 2019. Utilization of fruit by frugivores in lower montane forest at Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Chiang Mai province. Agriculture and Natural Resources 53(2019): 457–464. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2019.53.5.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2019.53.5.03
Rueangket, A. 2021. Influence of Fruit Functional Traits on Frugivores in Lower Montane Forest at Doi Suthep-Pui National Park, Chiang Mai Province. Ph.D. Thesis, Kasetsart University. Bangkok, Thailand. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467421000377
Sulistyawati, E., N. Mashita, N. N. Setiawan, D. N. Choesin & P. Suryana. 2012. Flowering and fruiting phenology of tree species in Mount Papandayan Nature Reserve, West Java, Indonesia. Tropical Life Sciences Research 23(2): 81–95.
Temchai, T., S. Suksawang, T. Wongthong, P. Jaikeaw, B. Rachapaksi & P. Thamlanka. 2019. The relative between phenology and climates factor of plants in evergreen forest permanent plot, Khao Chamao-Khao Wong National Park, Rayong province. Available Source: https://www.nprcenter.com/nprc1/downloads/phenology khao chamoa-khaowong_complete.pdf. (Accessed: November 23, 2021). (in Thai)
The Botanical Garden Organization. 2011. BGO plant database. The Botanical Garden Organization., Chiangmai, Thailand. Available Source: http://www.qsbg.org/Database/BOTANIC_Book%20full%20option/. (Accessed: July 1, 2019). (in Thai)
Tongkok, S., X. He, M. J. M. Alcantara, C. Saralamba, A. Nathalang, W. Chanthorn, W. Y. Brockelman & L. Lin. 2020. Composition of frugivores of Baccaurea ramiflora (Phyllanthaceae) and effects of environmental factors on frugivory in two tropical forests of China and Thailand. Global Ecology and Conservation 23(6): e01096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01096
Vongkuna, K. 2005. Diversity of epiphytic mosses at Huai Kog Ma Doi Suthep-Pui Chiang Mai Province. M.S. Thesis, Chiangmai University. Chiangmai, Thailand. (in Thai)
Whitmore, T. C. 1990. An introduction to tropical rain forests. Clarendon Press.
Wang, X., Y. Liu, Y. Chen & J. Tan. 2021. Variations of summer extreme and total precipitation over Southeast Asia. Journal of Climate 35(19): 6223–6242. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-1020.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-1020.1
Yu, H., N-X. Zhao, Y-Z. Chen, Y. Deng, J-Y. Yao & H-G. Ye. 2006. Phenology and reproductive strategy of a common fig in Guangzhou. Botanical Studies 47: 435–441.
